Search for: "Crown v. Social Security"
Results 1 - 20
of 217
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm
Chapter V does expressly apply to the Crown but [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 6:25 am
The recent criminal case of R. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 10:53 am
Circuit’s decision in Qassim v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:32 am
The Crown Court Decision Ms Hilton pled guilty in 2015 under section 105A of the Social Security Administration (Northern Ireland) Act 1972 to obtaining income support dishonestly by failing to report that she had part-time employment. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 11:52 am
Robert Chesney provided an in-depth analysis of the legal and policy lessons of the Doe v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 6:50 pm
The Crown’s position, based on R. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 6:54 pm
The Crown’s position, based on R. v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:28 am
The Ninth Circuit did, in Catholic Social Services, address the analytic structure in which American Pipe applies to future class actions. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
Most prominently, will 1935’s Social Security Act come up for review? [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
Section 71 of the 1992 Act provides the only route to recovery of social security benefits overpayments to the exclusion of any common law rights. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
“In essence, there was a change in perception—from viewing a patent as a contract between the crown and the patentee to viewing it as a ‘social contract’ between the patentee and society. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 7:30 pm
Zynga, 7/30/201 (Securities Fraud); Lexos Media v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 4:42 pm
The second article alleged that highly sensitive security documents seen by the newspaper proved that “a trio of alleged terrorists were bugged. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm
The appeal by way of case stated in the “Twitter joke” case (Chambers v DPP) has been allowed. [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:45 am
In Catholic Social Services, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 5:08 am
Circuit ruled in the case of Qassim v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Facts Note: This case deals with the possibility of a tort action in negligence for breach of a duty of care during negotiation of a contract (specifically during the solicitation and evaluation of tendered bids). [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 1:53 pm
The court in R. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 1:53 pm
The court in R. v. [read post]
